SOME SAY IT’S DECEIVING VOTERS. >> WE DON’T LET ONE COMMUNITY FORCE ANOTHER TO RENAME ITS STREETS, REPAINT ITS BUILDINGS, OR REDESIGN ITS ROADS. SO WE SHOULDN’T LET OUTSIDERS FORCE CASINOS INTO COMMUNITIES THAT DON’T WANT THEM. YOU’VE PROBABLY SEEN ADS ON TV LIKE THIS ONE. >> IT’S FROM LOCAL VOTERS IN CHARGE. THE GROUP BEHIND ISSUE TWO. >> IT’S NOT OKAY FOR THE STATE TO FORCE A CASINO ON A COUNTY THAT DOES NOT WANT IT. >> ISSUE TWO IS BASED ON REALLY A VERY, VERY SIMPLE PREMISE THAT LOCAL VOTERS, THE PEOPLE WITHIN THE COMMUNITIES THAT ARE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY CASINO PROJECTS, THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO SHOULD HAVE THE FINAL SAY ON WHETHER A CASINO PROJECT GOES FORWARD OR NOT. AND IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE. >> HANS STURTZ IS WITH LOCAL VOTERS IN CHARGE, IF APPROVED BY VOTERS, ISSUE TWO WOULD STOP A PLANNED AND NOW …
Whos behind Issue 2 and what it means to Arkansas voters [Video]
Categories